Is Obama Anti-American?

Apparently, here's the deal: If you are a longtime enemy of the United States, count on a grand reception from the Obama administration. All is forgiven and, worse, forgotten. But if you have a track record as an ally or friend, you won't get the right time of day.

Consider how our enemies are being treated:

Fidel Castro's Cuba? The travel restrictions will be lifted and, doubtless, soon the embargo will be repealed.

 Hugo Chavez's Venezuela? Despite the proof of political imprisonment, repression of liberties, confiscation of newspapers, and electoral violence and fraud, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton tells Chavez that "ideology is so yesterday," and Obama give Chavez a "yo bro" handshake.

Vladimir Putin's Russia?
It invaded Georgia, but who's counting? We are "resetting" the relationship. 

Hamas? $900 million of foreign aid, channeled through the UNRWA, a United Nations front filled with Hamas operatives.

Iran? No need to stop uranium enrichment -- the United States will begin endless talks while Tehran nears nuclear capacity.

And our friends?

Israel? Vice President Biden warns against military action to stop Iran from getting the bomb. And Defense Secretary Gates joins the chorus. The administration pressures Israel to buy into the two-state solution, requiring it to recognize a Palestinian state dominated by Hamas and dedicated to the destruction of Israel. The last time Israel ceded territory to the Palestinians, they used the land for new rocket launching pads.

Britain? Obama returned the Churchill bust and humiliated Prime Minister Gordon Brown by giving a gift of some DVDs on his visit.

Colombia? While President Uribe battles those who want to send drugs into our country and faces a military buildup from neighboring Venezuela, Obama won't submit the free trade deal with Bogota to the Senate.

And, within the United States, we free the Guantanamo terrorists while we investigate and potentially prosecute those who interrogated them in an effort to protect us all from their planned mayhem.

What a great time to be our enemy! What a terrible time to be our friend!

Oblivious to the record of terror attacks thwarted by enhanced interrogation techniques, Obama opens the door to prosecuting -- criminally -- those who authorized them.

Does he not realize that there would be no Brooklyn Bridge -- and ten thousand people would have died in the waters of the East River -- if we had not waterboarded Khalid Sheikh Mohammed? After the National Security Administration picked up mentions of the "Brooklyn Bridge" in its warrantless wiretaps, it alerted New York City Police Commissioner Ray Kelly to the possibility of a terror attack against the bridge. Kelly flooded the bridge with cops and commissioned an engineering study to determine how one could bring down the bridge, plunging ten thousand people into the East River during rush hour.

The study said it was impossible to blow the bridge up -- one would have been discovered -- but that a terrorist could sever the cable holding it aloft with a torch. It would take weeks, but the terrorists could work, undetected, in a vacant building that housed the cables under the bridge. The traffic noises would mask their efforts, and the building was not patrolled or even visited by anyone.

The terrorist noted the cops on the bridge and sent a message, intercepted by the NSA, that it was "too hot on the Brooklyn Bridge." But it was not until we waterboarded Mohammed that we learned the identity of the al-Qaida operative -- Lyman Farris. On learning his name, the New York Police raided his Brooklyn apartment. Chillingly, they found the equipment he would need to bring down the bridge and an engineering diagram (akin to that which Kelly had ordered) identifying where they would have to stand to cut the cables.

Does Obama really want to prosecute the anti-terror investigators who saved thousands by waterboarding Mohammed and learning this information?

Yes, he damn well does!

 

by American Thinker

Barack Obama Polite, Ignorant or just Stupid

 

Barack Hussein Obama
44th President
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

When one connects the dots between all his past relationships, where he comes from, who his heros are, the people he associates himself with and those he looks up to, we can see the real Barack Hussein Obama, the man, his philosophy, integrity and transparency or lack thereof is either arrogance, ignorance or stupidity because a standing president can’t be as Anti-American or destructive as this man has been so far to this nation. 

Whether we lean Republican or Democratic, we can see that it’s not a very Presidential picture.

One of my next articles will be a count of how his most vocal bills, initiatives or blatant disregards of the United States Constitution.

Here is a short list of items in his first year as president that he has taken on which all violate the constitution in one way or another.

• A healthcare initiative which would require everyone, not just the rich but also the middle classes to pay for healthcare for those who’d rather not work and just collect benefits the government will provide for them all while integrating, then covering up and then renaming death panels for determining when a senior citizen or terminal patient will or will not get treatments they need due to cost, thus the name death panel which will offer them “end of life counseling” FYI this is not all in the past, it’s in the bill that was passed.
• Expanding dependence on government programs, with this who needs to work?
• Disregard of the first amendment “Freedom of Speech” or revamp it in such a way which would silence those whom have opposing views of his initiatives in any way. 
  - Fairness Doctrine revisions to silence conservative talk radio, internet, television and other media outlets.
  - Votes with the U.N. in favor of enact new blasphemy laws to protect islam.
  - Selecting what media messages are to be disseminated to the public to silence his critics and not permit those reporters access to government official interviews. 
  
• Implementing Systematic strategies to devalue the United States currency in hopes of moving to a global currency. Extremely dangerous, he would like us to adopt the euro which could have drastic negative impact on our country.
• Non-Profit, Union Groups and Political payoffs in exchange for votes in favor of his initiatives and help campaigning, etc.
• Initiatives to unarm law abiding citizens and re-write the the part of the United States Bill of Rights that protects a right to keep and bear arms. An unarmed nation is easy to overthrow and easy for power hungry misguided politicians to manipulate. Take a look at Cuba, Venezuela and many of the other countries who’s leaders Obama admires.
• Wants the US to open our Borders and grant citizenship and of course access to tax payer dollars and benefits to illegal aliens who disregard U.S. law, many of which are also criminals in their own countries. This also lowers the guard on our borders and weakens our national security. While sure many are good people, they are still breaking US immigration and other laws while here, placing an economic burden on tax payers.

 

There are many more but this isn’t what my intention was for this article, I just wanted to bring up how he’s been apologizing for the U.S.A. throughout Europe while befriending terrorists, murderers and oppressors from Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez and others to a large list of state side extremist friends, crooks, liars and thieves.

 

Let me ask you something, what do the following photos mean to you, the United States and our place in world views.

President Obama Bows to King of Saudi Arabia (The President should not bow to any foreign leader, king or monarch)

 

bowing to Japanese emperor

 

Now the President is a Joke!

 

Plenty more satire all over the web and magazines

 

I saved the best for last which pretty much sums it up, Obama has cheapened what it means to be The President of The United States of America. Sarah Palin said it best when she predicted “Obama Would Diminish "The Prestige Of The United States Presidency"”

 

To make things worse, he doesn’t learn from his mistakes AND these are simple ones he should be able to get.

This latest image shows President Obama bowing to Tampa mayor Pam Iorio. What is wrong with this guy?

When one connects the dots we can see the real Barack Obama, the man and his philosophy.  Whether we lean Republican or Democratic, we can see that it’s not a very Presidential picture and now one year his lies and lack of transparency are becoming very apparent even to his backers putting aside the fact that his image and perhaps the image of future American presidents has been compromised.

Related Articles:

Other Obama Character questions by others

Obama Who?

Will Obama be our second anti-American president?

Obama United States Flag Etiquette issue

United States Flag Etiquette, Let’s see just how much respect Obama shows to the flag and our nation.

 

United States Flag Etiquette Website

"No disrespect should be shown to the flag of the United States of America." Section 8

"The flag represents a living country and is itself considered a living thing." Section 8j      

Read the full Flag Code

 

January 19, 2009, Baltimore, MD. Flags overprinted with the new President's image and name are distributed to celebrate his inauguration. Section 8g of the Flag Code reads, "The flag should never have placed upon it, nor on any part of it, nor attached to it any mark, insignia, letter, word, figure, design, picture, or drawing of any nature." above Photo credit: Baltimore Sun

 

 

Obama logos many of which are still used today violate flag etiquette.

 

Obama Says Flag Photo Is Another Internet Smear

"I was taught by my grandfather that you put your hand over your heart during the pledge, but during the Star Spangled Banner, you sing!"

Actually it is against the law for a citizen not to show respect for the flag.

Some conservative bloggers are furious about the above photo showing then Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama without his hand on his heart during the playing of "The Star-Spangled Banner." Obama has countered that the photo was taken during the national anthem, not the Pledge of Allegiance—so he didn't have to. Is that true?

No. According to U.S. law, a civilian like Obama is supposed to stand up when the anthem is played, take off his hat, face the flag, and put his right hand over his heart. When in uniform, members of the military can keep their hats on and salute instead of placing their hands on their hearts.*

The rules of conduct regarding the anthem, the pledge, and the American flag weren't always a matter of law. At first, they were just tradition. "The Star-Spangled Banner" lyrics were originally written during the War of 1812. Later in the 19^th century, the Army and Navy both began to use it during ceremonies, but it only became the congressionally recognized national anthem in 1931. Meanwhile, the Pledge of Allegiance was first used in public schools in 1892 to celebrate Columbus Day and only made it into the law books in the 1940s.

For those, including Obama who may still be ignorant to American flag etiquette here is the proof:

U.S. Code collection main page faq index search

TITLE 36 > Subtitle I > Part A > CHAPTER 3 > § 301Prev | Next § 301. National anthem (a) Designation.— The composition consisting of the words and music known as the Star-Spangled Banner is the national anthem. (b) Conduct During Playing.— During a rendition of the national anthem— (1) when the flag is displayed— (A) all present except those in uniform should stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart; (B) men not in uniform should remove their headdress with their right hand and hold the headdress at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart; and (C) individuals in uniform should give the military salute at the first note of the anthem and maintain that position until the last note; and (2) when the flag is not displayed, all present should face toward the music and act in the same manner they would if the flag were displayed.

Source: http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode36/usc_sec_36_00000301----000-.html  

 

In all fairness to all the Obama lovers and Bush haters to show many if not most Americans are ignorant to what it really means to be an American and what showing respect for our flag is all about even our leaders have become lackadaisical about basic flag etiquette which so many of our men and women have given their lives for since the creation of this country.

In July 2003 President Bush autographed a small flag. This picture was circulated across the Internet noting its violation of the Flag Code: "The flag should never have placed upon it, nor on any part of it, nor attached to it any mark, insignia, letter, word, figure, design, picture, or drawing of any nature." Above Photo credit: AP Photo/Charles Dharapak

Is Obama Reverting Back To His Indonesian/Muslim Name?

Can SOMEONE explain THIS?

http://barrysoetoro.com/

Click on the link below and LOOK at what you see!

My hope is that a hacker did this; if not America is in trouble!

In case you didn’t know Barry Soetoro is another alias name Barack Obama previously went by back in his Muslim schooling days back in Indonesia.

  

FYI to this day he refuses to release his school records, why are the secrecy if it could silence all those so vocal against him if he has nothing to hide?

Natural born citizen is not defined in the Constitution. But apparently the founders were relying on information from a writing of Emerich de Vattel.

“The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”

Chances are if you’re a Democrat, you’re shaking your head and saying, that’s not true, that never happened, that wasn’t his name, he didn’t go to school there.

You’d be saying he didn’t go to school in indonesia or should be because if he did, that country’s requirement is that the student must be an indonesian citizen, hmmm….

All those folks still demanding to see his original birth certificate doubting the “copy” posted on his website after continuous outrage from conservatives and some outspoken liberals alike just didn’t cut the mustard with many, especially since the posted birth certificate appeared to be… Fake!

These people don’t look like crazy left wing raticals now huh?

Even though the loudest speakers against Obama being a citizen were democrats which were eventually hushed with gag orders, cases dismissed by democrat liberal judges and of course his administration.

This article was based on a blog entry which can be found here http://romanticpoet.wordpress.com/2009/04/10/is-obama-reverting-back-to-his-indonesianmuslim-name/ and other sources.

 

Also check out these articles:

The Obama Birth Certificate Controversy
Obama & His Administration At War with Free Speech

Obama Lack of Transparency and the Truth about his Birth Certificate Controversy

For those not up on Obama facts perhaps you should first view this video to get caught up on the original controversy.

other facts vs. fiction found on the internet on this matter can be found here http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/l/lawyersues.htm

The sad facts are that the case was dismissed in the end without reason and a restraining order made preventing further inquiries into the matter. Was this a conspiracy perpetrated by Barrack Obama and the DNC – Democratic National Committee?  Unfortunately due to lack of public outcry and rage on this matter, media bias and political suppression of opposition we will probably never know or at least find out during Obama’s term as president.

 

Did Obama Become an Indonesian Citizen when His Mother, Ann Dunham, married Lolo Soetoro, and moved to Indonesia?

As outlined in more detail below, Mr. Philip A. Berg alleges, in his lawsuit against Obama, that Obama lost his US citizenship, by virtue of his mother's marriage to Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian, and her subsequent relocation with Obama to Indonesia.  (Note:  Berg's complaint has been dismissed, but he is appealing in both the Third Circuit and the Supreme Court.  See here for current status of his appeals.)

 

While many were put off by his muslim sounding name Barack Hussein Obama which was shortened to Barack Obama during his campaign (those using his full name were labeled racist), many of these people never knew he had previously went by another name, a name which really was his muslim given name Barry Soetoro, here is more on that story…

So when exactly did Barack Obama become Barack Obama?

There is now overwhelming evidence that for a significant portion of his childhood the man we now know as Barack Obama had a different legal name–he was Barry Soetoro. Both Texas Darlin and Matthew Weaver have written about the document that the Associated Press turned up showing Barack aka Barry registered at a Catholic school as a citizen of Indonesia and a muslim.

Inside Edition has done a story that features this document, see the video below:

 

Here’s what we know for sure:

Barack/Barry’s birth father was a non-practicing muslim from Kenya. Barack Obama of Kenya was a defacto polygamist but this had nothing to do with a deeply held religious believe.

When Barack/Barry’s mom, Stanley Ann Dunham married Lolo Soetoro Barack/Barry was adopted and became legally known as Barry Soetoro. Obama’s Hawaiian birth certificate was updated to reflect that fact sometime between 1965 and 1969.

In Indonesia Barry Soetoro (the man we now know as Barack) was considered to be a muslim and learned the muslim call to prayer. However, when Barry Soetoro moved back to Hawaii to live with his non-muslim grandparents we have no evidence that he continued to identify himself as a practicing muslim. I do not know why the Obama campaign allows this cloud to linger because the Republican machine will succeed in forcing him to concede that as a child he practiced Islam.

Matthew Weaver listed eight questions he would like answered. I have a much simpler list:

1. When did you change your name legally to Barack Obama? Why?

2. When did you renounce your Indonesian citizenship that came to you by virtue of your adoption by Lolo Soetoro?

What is fascinating in watching the video above that seeks to debunk the notion that Barack is a closet muslim is that all of his schoolmates know him and refer to him as BARRY. So Barry Soetoro, what is the real story?

UPDATE: Here’s the point the Obama crew fails to grasp. I am not alleging he did anything illegal or wrong, but his refusal to answer these questions in a simple, clear manner keeps the issue alive. And the Republicans are not going to give him a pass on these matters. They will insist on getting the answers. And the pressure will increase dramatically once the conventions are done. At that point Barack/Barry’s ability to talk about issues will be drowned out by the insistent demands that he “come clean.” The refusal to address these questions in a straightforward manner will simply reinforce the suspicion that he is hiding something. If the Democrats want to spend the fall dealing with he issues of his identity then they are likely to get their wish. It is simply amazing that these matters have not be cleared up by now.

The Obama birth certificate controversy emerged again in the last couple of weeks thanks to the questioning of Lou Dobbs:

 

I think it is important to put to rest the notion that Barack Obama was born in Kenya. He was not. He was born in Hawaii, a U.S. state, and by virtue of that fact is a U.S. citizen. So what’s the big deal? The Obama team have refused to release the original birth certificate and that fact fuels speculation that they are hiding something. Well they are. What?

Barack Obama was not named “Barack” in the original birth certificate. He was “Barry” not Barack. But that’s not all. The birth certificate was amended when he was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian muslim, around 1968. David Axelrod and Barack Obama decided against trying to explain these issues, worried that the Soetoro birth certificate would reinforce the charge that Barack was a secret muslim. Such a charge would have muddied the waters and alarmed too many folks in the midwest and south. They covered it up and, with the help of an incurious media, kept these questions tamped down.

Let me be clear. I do not know if Barack Obama meets the Constitutional requirements to be President. He was a young boy when he was adopted by Lolo Soetoro. As a youngster he had no say in the amendment to his original birth certificate however Indonesia does not allow dual citizenship and he needed to be a citizen to be a student there. He also was introduced to Islam through his step-father. But that relationship ended when Barry Obama Soetoro returned to Hawaii to live with his grandparents. He never renounced his U.S. citizenship that we are aware of however we don’t know either way. The refusal of Barack Obama and his political team to forthrightly address these issues has kept the controversy alive.

The following video by video blogger syc1959 illustrates how a birth certificate is legally “updated” to reflect an adoption.

 

Barack Obama is now caught in the lie. If he comes clean with the original copy of the birth certificate he will be damaged politically because it will be clear he was not forthcoming or transparent about his childhood. People will realize the story he has told is more myth than fact. This in turn will fuel a new meme, namely, that Barack Obama cannot be trusted to tell the truth.

Similarly the rightwing will be damaged if it persists with the nonsense that Barack was born in Kenya. I know many believe this but it is not true. The real reason Barack Obama is evasive about his original birth certificate is that he wants people to forget he once was an Indonesian muslim boy named Barry Soetoro.

It is that simple.

Yes, so much for transparency but this administration was created because of lies so why should they stop now!

 

 

 

Based in part on Original articles written by Larry C Johnson on his site http://www.noquarterusa.net and other sources easily found online and verifiable for those who really care and won’t discount this as a political agenda anyway.

Obama Against Free Speech – Revising the First Amendment

Obama & His Administration At War with Free Speech

Check out this article about Obama’s vote against free speech when it offends Muslims http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2009/10/obama-free-speech-u-s-votes-for-un-restrictions-on-free-speech/

but this is nothing new, from asking the public on live t.v. to report the names of your friends and neighbors who talk negatively about his administration and their health care initiative trying to silence free speech by his detractors.

NOW IT ALL MAKES SENSE?

A few examples of Obama exercising his socialist admiration views of communism via white house referendums like those banning conservative journalists from an air force one flight, to banning white house personnel from speaking to FOX news reporters or granting any interviews to FOX news (which was short lived via backlash), how about his still in the works effort to silence his detractors via trying to reinstituted the Fairness Doctrine (or some stealthier form of it) Read an article on Obama’s version of the Fairness Doctrine

Other Articles on Obama Against Free Speech

Obama Information Czar Calls For Banning Free Speech

USA Today - Obama administration has joined a U.N. effort to restrict religious speech to enact new blasphemy laws but these laws are not to protect Catholics or for that matter most other  religions, mainly to protect Islam, guess we can see where his roots really lay now.

Obama Chills Free Speech On Healthcare – this article also points out untruths promulgated by the Obama administration itself in it’s healthcare spam emails and other advertisements in the media. 

Obama’s Plan: Shut Off Free Speech by Shutting Off Internet, Talk Radio and Fox News

Obama threatens speech on radio, Web, print

Obama Declares War on Conservative Talk Radio

Obama Wages War on Freedom of Speech

Many more examples of this administrations not so transparent attempts to literally overhaul The United State of America by systematically dismantling our core beliefs and constitution as they see fit to promote their agenda. It sounds a bit like paranoia however the best investigators, law enforcement even secret agents are.

Just remember, freedom isn’t free!

~ God Bless America ~

The Mexican Invasion – By Americans?

Excerpts from:
Mexico's Immigration Law: Let's Try It Here at Home
by J. Michael Waller
05/08/2006

Mexico has a radical idea for a rational immigration policy that most  Americans would love. However, Mexican officials haven’t been sharing that idea with us as they press for our Congress to adopt the McCain-Kennedy immigration reform bill.

That's too bad, because Mexico, which annually deports more illegal aliens than the United States does, has much to teach us about how it handles the immigration issue.

Under Mexican law, it is a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico.

At a time when the Supreme Court and many politicians seek to bring American law in line with foreign legal norms, its noteworthy that nobody has argued that the U.S. look at how Mexico deals with immigration and what it might teach us about how best to solve
our illegal immigration problem. 

Mexico has a single, streamlined law that ensures that foreign visitors and immigrants are:

• in the country legally;
• have the means to sustain themselves economically;
• not destined to be burdens on society;
• of economic and social benefit to society;
• of good character and have no criminal records; and
• contributors to the general well-being of the nation.
  

The law also ensures that:

• immigration authorities have a record of each foreign visitor;
• foreign visitors do not violate their visa status;
• foreign visitors are banned from interfering in the country’s internal politics;
• foreign visitors who enter under false pretenses are imprisoned or deported;
• foreign visitors violating the terms of their entry are imprisoned or deported;
• those who aid in illegal immigration will be sent to prison.
  

Who could disagree with such a law?
It makes perfect sense. The Mexican constitution strictly defines the rights of citizens -- and the denial of many fundamental rights to non-citizens, illegal and illegal.

Under the constitution, the Ley General de Población, or
General Law on Population, spells out specifically the country's immigration policy.

It is an interesting law -- and one that should cause us all to ask, Why is our great southern neighbor pushing us to water down our own immigration laws and policies, when its own immigration restrictions are the toughest on the continent?

If a felony is a crime punishable by more than one year in prison, then Mexican law makes it a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico.

If the United States adopted such statutes, Mexico no doubt would denounce it as a manifestation of American racism and bigotry.

We looked at the immigration provisions of the Mexican constitution.

[1] Now let's look at Mexico's main immigration law.
Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:

• Foreigners are admitted into Mexico "according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress." (Article 32
• Immigration officials must "ensure" that "immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance" and for their dependents. (Article 34)
• Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets "the equilibrium of the national demographics," when foreigners are deemed detrimental to "economic or national interests," when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and when "they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy." (Article 37)
• The Secretary of Governance may "suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest." (Article 38)
  Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country:
• Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article 73)
• A National Population Registry keeps track of "every single individual who comprises the population of the country," and verifies each individual's identity. (Articles 85 and 86)
• A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91).
  Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned:
• Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article 116)
• Foreigners who sign government documents "with a signature that is false or different from that which he normally uses" are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article 116)
  Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons:
• Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)
• Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)
• Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121). Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico -- such as working with out a permit -- can also be imprisoned.
  Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says,
• "A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country illegally." (Article 123)
• Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico instead of being imprisoned. (Article 125)
• Foreigners who "attempt against national sovereignty or security" will be deported. (Article 126)
  Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the law:
• A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner live in the country is subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)
• Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132)
  

All of the above runs contrary to what Mexican leaders are demanding of the United States. The stark contrast between Mexico's immigration practices versus its American immigration preaching's is telling. It gives a clear picture of the Mexican government's agenda: to have a one-way immigration relationship with the United States.

Let's call Mexico's bluff on its unwarranted interference in U.S. immigration policy. Let's propose, just to make a point, that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) member nations standardize their immigration laws by using Mexico's own law as a model.
This article was first posted at CenterforSecurityPolicy.org.