Is Obama Reverting Back To His Indonesian/Muslim Name?

Can SOMEONE explain THIS?

http://barrysoetoro.com/

Click on the link below and LOOK at what you see!

My hope is that a hacker did this; if not America is in trouble!

In case you didn’t know Barry Soetoro is another alias name Barack Obama previously went by back in his Muslim schooling days back in Indonesia.

  

FYI to this day he refuses to release his school records, why are the secrecy if it could silence all those so vocal against him if he has nothing to hide?

Natural born citizen is not defined in the Constitution. But apparently the founders were relying on information from a writing of Emerich de Vattel.

“The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”

Chances are if you’re a Democrat, you’re shaking your head and saying, that’s not true, that never happened, that wasn’t his name, he didn’t go to school there.

You’d be saying he didn’t go to school in indonesia or should be because if he did, that country’s requirement is that the student must be an indonesian citizen, hmmm….

All those folks still demanding to see his original birth certificate doubting the “copy” posted on his website after continuous outrage from conservatives and some outspoken liberals alike just didn’t cut the mustard with many, especially since the posted birth certificate appeared to be… Fake!

These people don’t look like crazy left wing raticals now huh?

Even though the loudest speakers against Obama being a citizen were democrats which were eventually hushed with gag orders, cases dismissed by democrat liberal judges and of course his administration.

This article was based on a blog entry which can be found here http://romanticpoet.wordpress.com/2009/04/10/is-obama-reverting-back-to-his-indonesianmuslim-name/ and other sources.

 

Also check out these articles:

The Obama Birth Certificate Controversy
Obama & His Administration At War with Free Speech

Obama Lack of Transparency and the Truth about his Birth Certificate Controversy

For those not up on Obama facts perhaps you should first view this video to get caught up on the original controversy.

other facts vs. fiction found on the internet on this matter can be found here http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/l/lawyersues.htm

The sad facts are that the case was dismissed in the end without reason and a restraining order made preventing further inquiries into the matter. Was this a conspiracy perpetrated by Barrack Obama and the DNC – Democratic National Committee?  Unfortunately due to lack of public outcry and rage on this matter, media bias and political suppression of opposition we will probably never know or at least find out during Obama’s term as president.

 

Did Obama Become an Indonesian Citizen when His Mother, Ann Dunham, married Lolo Soetoro, and moved to Indonesia?

As outlined in more detail below, Mr. Philip A. Berg alleges, in his lawsuit against Obama, that Obama lost his US citizenship, by virtue of his mother's marriage to Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian, and her subsequent relocation with Obama to Indonesia.  (Note:  Berg's complaint has been dismissed, but he is appealing in both the Third Circuit and the Supreme Court.  See here for current status of his appeals.)

 

While many were put off by his muslim sounding name Barack Hussein Obama which was shortened to Barack Obama during his campaign (those using his full name were labeled racist), many of these people never knew he had previously went by another name, a name which really was his muslim given name Barry Soetoro, here is more on that story…

So when exactly did Barack Obama become Barack Obama?

There is now overwhelming evidence that for a significant portion of his childhood the man we now know as Barack Obama had a different legal name–he was Barry Soetoro. Both Texas Darlin and Matthew Weaver have written about the document that the Associated Press turned up showing Barack aka Barry registered at a Catholic school as a citizen of Indonesia and a muslim.

Inside Edition has done a story that features this document, see the video below:

 

Here’s what we know for sure:

Barack/Barry’s birth father was a non-practicing muslim from Kenya. Barack Obama of Kenya was a defacto polygamist but this had nothing to do with a deeply held religious believe.

When Barack/Barry’s mom, Stanley Ann Dunham married Lolo Soetoro Barack/Barry was adopted and became legally known as Barry Soetoro. Obama’s Hawaiian birth certificate was updated to reflect that fact sometime between 1965 and 1969.

In Indonesia Barry Soetoro (the man we now know as Barack) was considered to be a muslim and learned the muslim call to prayer. However, when Barry Soetoro moved back to Hawaii to live with his non-muslim grandparents we have no evidence that he continued to identify himself as a practicing muslim. I do not know why the Obama campaign allows this cloud to linger because the Republican machine will succeed in forcing him to concede that as a child he practiced Islam.

Matthew Weaver listed eight questions he would like answered. I have a much simpler list:

1. When did you change your name legally to Barack Obama? Why?

2. When did you renounce your Indonesian citizenship that came to you by virtue of your adoption by Lolo Soetoro?

What is fascinating in watching the video above that seeks to debunk the notion that Barack is a closet muslim is that all of his schoolmates know him and refer to him as BARRY. So Barry Soetoro, what is the real story?

UPDATE: Here’s the point the Obama crew fails to grasp. I am not alleging he did anything illegal or wrong, but his refusal to answer these questions in a simple, clear manner keeps the issue alive. And the Republicans are not going to give him a pass on these matters. They will insist on getting the answers. And the pressure will increase dramatically once the conventions are done. At that point Barack/Barry’s ability to talk about issues will be drowned out by the insistent demands that he “come clean.” The refusal to address these questions in a straightforward manner will simply reinforce the suspicion that he is hiding something. If the Democrats want to spend the fall dealing with he issues of his identity then they are likely to get their wish. It is simply amazing that these matters have not be cleared up by now.

The Obama birth certificate controversy emerged again in the last couple of weeks thanks to the questioning of Lou Dobbs:

 

I think it is important to put to rest the notion that Barack Obama was born in Kenya. He was not. He was born in Hawaii, a U.S. state, and by virtue of that fact is a U.S. citizen. So what’s the big deal? The Obama team have refused to release the original birth certificate and that fact fuels speculation that they are hiding something. Well they are. What?

Barack Obama was not named “Barack” in the original birth certificate. He was “Barry” not Barack. But that’s not all. The birth certificate was amended when he was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian muslim, around 1968. David Axelrod and Barack Obama decided against trying to explain these issues, worried that the Soetoro birth certificate would reinforce the charge that Barack was a secret muslim. Such a charge would have muddied the waters and alarmed too many folks in the midwest and south. They covered it up and, with the help of an incurious media, kept these questions tamped down.

Let me be clear. I do not know if Barack Obama meets the Constitutional requirements to be President. He was a young boy when he was adopted by Lolo Soetoro. As a youngster he had no say in the amendment to his original birth certificate however Indonesia does not allow dual citizenship and he needed to be a citizen to be a student there. He also was introduced to Islam through his step-father. But that relationship ended when Barry Obama Soetoro returned to Hawaii to live with his grandparents. He never renounced his U.S. citizenship that we are aware of however we don’t know either way. The refusal of Barack Obama and his political team to forthrightly address these issues has kept the controversy alive.

The following video by video blogger syc1959 illustrates how a birth certificate is legally “updated” to reflect an adoption.

 

Barack Obama is now caught in the lie. If he comes clean with the original copy of the birth certificate he will be damaged politically because it will be clear he was not forthcoming or transparent about his childhood. People will realize the story he has told is more myth than fact. This in turn will fuel a new meme, namely, that Barack Obama cannot be trusted to tell the truth.

Similarly the rightwing will be damaged if it persists with the nonsense that Barack was born in Kenya. I know many believe this but it is not true. The real reason Barack Obama is evasive about his original birth certificate is that he wants people to forget he once was an Indonesian muslim boy named Barry Soetoro.

It is that simple.

Yes, so much for transparency but this administration was created because of lies so why should they stop now!

 

 

 

Based in part on Original articles written by Larry C Johnson on his site http://www.noquarterusa.net and other sources easily found online and verifiable for those who really care and won’t discount this as a political agenda anyway.

Obama Against Free Speech – Revising the First Amendment

Obama & His Administration At War with Free Speech

Check out this article about Obama’s vote against free speech when it offends Muslims http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2009/10/obama-free-speech-u-s-votes-for-un-restrictions-on-free-speech/

but this is nothing new, from asking the public on live t.v. to report the names of your friends and neighbors who talk negatively about his administration and their health care initiative trying to silence free speech by his detractors.

NOW IT ALL MAKES SENSE?

A few examples of Obama exercising his socialist admiration views of communism via white house referendums like those banning conservative journalists from an air force one flight, to banning white house personnel from speaking to FOX news reporters or granting any interviews to FOX news (which was short lived via backlash), how about his still in the works effort to silence his detractors via trying to reinstituted the Fairness Doctrine (or some stealthier form of it) Read an article on Obama’s version of the Fairness Doctrine

Other Articles on Obama Against Free Speech

Obama Information Czar Calls For Banning Free Speech

USA Today - Obama administration has joined a U.N. effort to restrict religious speech to enact new blasphemy laws but these laws are not to protect Catholics or for that matter most other  religions, mainly to protect Islam, guess we can see where his roots really lay now.

Obama Chills Free Speech On Healthcare – this article also points out untruths promulgated by the Obama administration itself in it’s healthcare spam emails and other advertisements in the media. 

Obama’s Plan: Shut Off Free Speech by Shutting Off Internet, Talk Radio and Fox News

Obama threatens speech on radio, Web, print

Obama Declares War on Conservative Talk Radio

Obama Wages War on Freedom of Speech

Many more examples of this administrations not so transparent attempts to literally overhaul The United State of America by systematically dismantling our core beliefs and constitution as they see fit to promote their agenda. It sounds a bit like paranoia however the best investigators, law enforcement even secret agents are.

Just remember, freedom isn’t free!

~ God Bless America ~

The Mexican Invasion – By Americans?

Excerpts from:
Mexico's Immigration Law: Let's Try It Here at Home
by J. Michael Waller
05/08/2006

Mexico has a radical idea for a rational immigration policy that most  Americans would love. However, Mexican officials haven’t been sharing that idea with us as they press for our Congress to adopt the McCain-Kennedy immigration reform bill.

That's too bad, because Mexico, which annually deports more illegal aliens than the United States does, has much to teach us about how it handles the immigration issue.

Under Mexican law, it is a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico.

At a time when the Supreme Court and many politicians seek to bring American law in line with foreign legal norms, its noteworthy that nobody has argued that the U.S. look at how Mexico deals with immigration and what it might teach us about how best to solve
our illegal immigration problem. 

Mexico has a single, streamlined law that ensures that foreign visitors and immigrants are:

• in the country legally;
• have the means to sustain themselves economically;
• not destined to be burdens on society;
• of economic and social benefit to society;
• of good character and have no criminal records; and
• contributors to the general well-being of the nation.
  

The law also ensures that:

• immigration authorities have a record of each foreign visitor;
• foreign visitors do not violate their visa status;
• foreign visitors are banned from interfering in the country’s internal politics;
• foreign visitors who enter under false pretenses are imprisoned or deported;
• foreign visitors violating the terms of their entry are imprisoned or deported;
• those who aid in illegal immigration will be sent to prison.
  

Who could disagree with such a law?
It makes perfect sense. The Mexican constitution strictly defines the rights of citizens -- and the denial of many fundamental rights to non-citizens, illegal and illegal.

Under the constitution, the Ley General de Población, or
General Law on Population, spells out specifically the country's immigration policy.

It is an interesting law -- and one that should cause us all to ask, Why is our great southern neighbor pushing us to water down our own immigration laws and policies, when its own immigration restrictions are the toughest on the continent?

If a felony is a crime punishable by more than one year in prison, then Mexican law makes it a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico.

If the United States adopted such statutes, Mexico no doubt would denounce it as a manifestation of American racism and bigotry.

We looked at the immigration provisions of the Mexican constitution.

[1] Now let's look at Mexico's main immigration law.
Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:

• Foreigners are admitted into Mexico "according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress." (Article 32
• Immigration officials must "ensure" that "immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance" and for their dependents. (Article 34)
• Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets "the equilibrium of the national demographics," when foreigners are deemed detrimental to "economic or national interests," when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and when "they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy." (Article 37)
• The Secretary of Governance may "suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest." (Article 38)
  Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country:
• Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article 73)
• A National Population Registry keeps track of "every single individual who comprises the population of the country," and verifies each individual's identity. (Articles 85 and 86)
• A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91).
  Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned:
• Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article 116)
• Foreigners who sign government documents "with a signature that is false or different from that which he normally uses" are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article 116)
  Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons:
• Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)
• Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)
• Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121). Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico -- such as working with out a permit -- can also be imprisoned.
  Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says,
• "A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country illegally." (Article 123)
• Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico instead of being imprisoned. (Article 125)
• Foreigners who "attempt against national sovereignty or security" will be deported. (Article 126)
  Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the law:
• A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner live in the country is subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)
• Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132)
  

All of the above runs contrary to what Mexican leaders are demanding of the United States. The stark contrast between Mexico's immigration practices versus its American immigration preaching's is telling. It gives a clear picture of the Mexican government's agenda: to have a one-way immigration relationship with the United States.

Let's call Mexico's bluff on its unwarranted interference in U.S. immigration policy. Let's propose, just to make a point, that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) member nations standardize their immigration laws by using Mexico's own law as a model.
This article was first posted at CenterforSecurityPolicy.org.

SEIU ACORN and Democrats on Mission to Legalize Illegals

There at it again ACORN and house Democrats together again backing legalizing illegal immigrants. Lawmakers pushing for immigration reform say job losses and a sluggish economy should not deter legislation legalizing illegal immigrants.

I kind of find that hard to swallow at a time when there are 15 million Americans out of work, liberals would want to take a stand with ACORN and SEIU labor unions to want to legalize 12 million illegal immigrants and offer them the opportunity to become full fledged citizens and the jobs that should be going to American workers.

URGENT: House Democrats to unveil new amnesty bill tomorrow. Fight back & stop this in its tracks, call your Representatives and say NO to any form of amnesty for ILLEGAL immigrants!

Find your local legislators contact info here: http://rightlyconservative.com/SEARCH

 

WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--U.S. House Democratic lawmakers on Tuesday plan to introduce a bill that would overhaul the country's immigration laws, although aides say any movement is on hold until a nearly year-long push on sweeping health-care legislation is completed.

The legislation is set to be introduced by Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D., Ill.), the chairman of the House Immigration Caucus. The effort has the backing of two key groups within the House Democratic membership - the Hispanic and liberal-leaning Progressive caucuses.

It would offer a new path with little to no legal residence for people currently living illegally in the U.S. to gain legal status and citizenship, potentially opening the flood gates inviting people to sneak into the U.S. as the quickest and cheapest route to legal status and citizenship circumventing our countries immigration process by overhauling it to reward those who ignore U.S. law.

Conservative lawmakers are not buying into the propaganda being pushed by the liberals, ACORN and other leftist advocacy groups either.  “With 15 million Americans out of work, it’s hard to believe that anyone would give amnesty to 12 million illegal immigrants,” said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee. “Even the open-borders crowd agrees that illegal immigrants take jobs from American workers, particularly poor and disadvantaged citizens and legal immigrants. This is exactly why we need to oppose amnesty.”

Democrats unveiled the kind of immigration reform they want at a Capitol Hill news conference today 12/15/09.

They are proposing that…

• illegal immigrants register with the government (they don’t do it now and get away with it, why would the bad ones come forward and what will they do to  find them or enforce any laws to deport them. If there is an answer to that question, why aren’t they doing it now?)
• Pay a $500 fine for each adult (US Citizenship for sale getting CHEAP & Easy?),
• Learn English (they don’t require that of legal immigrants so it won’t be enforceable, will they actually deny them if they can’t learn English, I see law suites galore for that. How long will they give them to learn it?),
• pass background checks (how do they intend to do that, imagine the waiting list to investigate these peoples background by already under staffed, over worked border patrol and INS let alone how they plan to do those background checks)
• and meet other requirements (hmmm… other wishful thinking items). They then are eligible for a six-year visa and when that is done a green card and citizenship and registration to vote with the helping hands of ACORN and SEIU, I wonder what how they’ll register?

   

“Sounds like a free pass!”

In reference to the bad economy, “It certainly will confuse the debate a lot more, but at the end of the day what we have to understand is fixing this system will be good for American workers,” said Eliseo Medina, executive vice president of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), (ACORN) which is one of the major advocates for legalizing illegal immigrant workers.  They are also on the books for having spent more time in the White House with the Obama Administration than any other group. Another broken promise, So much for that transparency thing. Obama has the always be campaigning mentality and registering hundreds of thousands of new democrat voters is a sure path to secure a re-election.

 

URGENT: House Democrats to unveil new amnesty bill tomorrow. Fight back & stop this in its tracks, call your Representatives and say NO to any form of amnesty for ILLEGAL immigrants!

Find your local legislators contact info here: http://rightlyconservative.com/SEARCH

 

Article Reference Sources:
http://facefwd.com/not-born-in-the-usa/acorn-backs-legalizing-illegal-immigrants/
http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20091214-714788.html

Ignorance of Ability Brings Disability

Watch as this short film so eloquently frames a picture of just how rushing to judgment without knowing all the facts can show how wrong someone can be.

This film also teaches that Ignorance of Ability Brings Disability.

If you don’t understand what I mean, I’ll give a real world example how this is similar to how United States President Obama and house democrats want to take from the working man and give more and more to those who don't work and rather just wait for and expect a hand out from everything from housing to food to money, cell phones, healthcare, you name it there are already a lot of these programs in place.

We should be cutting back on such programs as most were originally meant for people truly in need and only as a temporary form of assistance. This only goes to show how offering such “assistance” over the long term and as a permanent “benefit” kill the will or need or sense of urgency for anyone to want to work in exchange for better government support and charity. I also fear what is happening behind the scenes as the driving force and untold agendas the politicians promoting such services are vying for.

 

“Those willing to give up Liberty in exchange for Safety, will have neither.”

- Derived from a quote from Benjamin Franklin

 

Does anyone else see a similarities and just how a good intention can do more damage than good if not closely monitored and closely scrutinized?

While our United States Government officials in congress (mainly liberal democrats and a socialist president Obama) take away more and more of our liberties in exchange for government benefits, the reasons or will to work for a living diminish exponentially as do our rights, liberties and the ability to pursue happiness.

especially when the level of happiness through achievable success are directly dependent upon what levels our government bureaucrats deem acceptable.

 

 

The above quote is my play on words derived from a now famous quote from Benjamin Franklin, the actual quote and history of it is as follows.

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. "
This statement was used as a motto on the title page of An Historical Review of the Constitution and Government of Pennsylvania. (1759) which was attributed to Franklin in the edition of 1812, but in a letter of September 27, 1760 to David Hume, he states that he published this book and denies that he wrote it, other than a few remarks that were credited to the Pennsylvania Assembly, in which he served.
The phrase itself was first used in a letter from that Assembly dated November 11, 1755 to the Governor of Pennsylvania.

Sailor Says Obama Shape up or Ship out

I got this email, I do find these types of emails annoying but liked this one quite a bit. I’m in total agreement with the guy, he’s got it dead on!

Wow!  Read this one.  It is really good.  And this gentleman says it just like it is.

 

WW II Battleship sailor tells Obama to shape up or ship out !

This venerable and much honored WW II vet is well known in Hawaii for his seventy-plus years of service to patriotic organizations and causes all over the country. A humble man without a political bone in his body, he has never spoken out before about a government official, until now.

He dictated this letter  to a friend, signed it and mailed it to the president.

Dear President Obama,     

     My name is Harold Estes, approaching 95 on December 13 of this year.  People meeting me for the first time don't believe my age because I remain wrinkle free and pretty much mentally alert.

I enlisted in the U.S. Navy in 1934 and served proudly before, during and after WW II retiring as a Master Chief Bos'n Mate.  Now I live in a "rest home" located on the western end of Pearl Harbor, allowing me to keep alive the memories of 23 years of service to my country.

One of the benefits of my age, perhaps the only one, is to speak my mind, blunt and direct even to the head man.

So here goes.

I am amazed, angry and determined not to see my country die before I do, but you seem hell bent not to grant me that wish.

I can't figure out what country you are the president of.

You fly around the world telling our friends and enemies despicable lies like:

             " We're no longer a Christian nation"

  " America is arrogant" - (Your wife even announced to the world,"America is mean- spirited. " Please tell her to try preaching that nonsense to 23 generations of our war dead buried all over the globe who died for no other reason than to free a whole lot of strangers from tyranny and hopelessness.)

I'd say shame on the both of you, but I don't think you like America, nor do I see an ounce of gratefulness in anything you do, for the obvious gifts this country has given you.  To be without shame or gratefulness is a dangerous thing for a man sitting in the White House.

After 9/11 you said," America hasn't lived up to her ideals."

Which ones did you mean? Was it the notion of personal liberty that 11,000 farmers and shopkeepers died for to win independence from the British?  Or maybe the ideal that no man should be a slave to another man, that 500,000 men died for in the Civil War?  I hope you didn't mean the ideal 470,000 fathers, brothers, husbands, and a lot of fellas I knew personally died for in WWII, because we felt real strongly about not letting any nation push us around, because we stand for freedom.

I don't think you mean the ideal that says equality is better than discrimination.  You know the one that a whole lot of white people understood when they helped to get you elected.

Take a little advice from a very old geezer, young man.

Shape up and start acting like an American.  If you don't, I'll do what I can to see you get shipped out of that fancy rental on Pennsylvania Avenue.  You were elected to lead not to bow, apologize and kiss the hands of murderers and corrupt leaders who still treat their people like slaves.

And just who do you think you are telling the American people not to jump to conclusions and condemn that Muslim major who killed 13 of his fellow soldiers and wounded dozens more. You mean you don't want us to do what you did when that white cop used force to subdue that black college professor in Massachusetts, who was putting up a fight?  You don't mind offending the police calling them stupid but you don't want us to offend Muslim fanatics by calling them what they are, terrorists.

One more thing.  I realize you never served in the military and never had to defend your country with your life, but you're the Commander-in-Chief now, son.  Do your job.  When your battle-hardened field General asks you for 40,000 more troops to complete the mission, give them to him.  But if you're not in this fight to win, then get out.  The life of one American soldier is not worth the best political strategy you're thinking of.

You could be our greatest president because you face the greatest challenge ever presented to any president. 

You're not going to restore American greatness by bringing back our bloated economy.  That's not our greatest threat.  Losing the heart and soul of who we are as Americans is our big fight now.

And I sure as hell don't want to think my president is the enemy in this final battle.

Sincerely,

Harold B. Estes

When a 95 year old hero of the "the Greatest Generation" stands up and speaks out like this, I think we owe it to him to send his words to as many Americans as we can. Please pass it on.